Arkona
РусEng

News

26 February 2018

Unfair contractor claimed payment on construction contract for work executed de jure but not executed de facto. Its claim was based on work acceptance certificate signed by both parties.

Unfair contractor claimed payment on construction contract for work executed de jure but not executed de facto. Its claim was based on work acceptance certificate signed by both parties.

Layers of Arkona represented defendant (Customer in the construction contract). Despite of existence of basic documents confirming execution of work we represented to the court convincing evidences that that work had not been done in fact.

Represented evidences turned out to be enough to make the plaintiff drop the action.

Therefore existence of construction contract and work acceptance certificate signed by all the parties is not a reason of debt enforcement in case if a defendant is able to prove that work was not executed in fact.

© Arkona Сo., Ltd.,

112 lit. B, Fontanka Embankment,
St. Petersburg, Russia, 190005
+7 (812) 602-08-16

Contacts Sitemap


Designed by Life-work Studio