Arkona
РусEng
Arkona / Services / Administrative practice

Administrative practice

Pugin Andrey
Pugin Andrey
Chief Executive Officer
 

An existing tendency towards expansion of administrative regulation and upgrading of penalties for administrative offences forces individuals and legal entities to participate in administrative proceedings more and more actively. We represent clients both at the stage of administrative investigation and at the stage of court proceedings. We successfully appeal against passed on rulings on administrative offences.

Our services:

  • Consulting on issues of administrative relations with public and municipal authorities
  • Legal examination of actions and decisions of administrative authorities
  • Defense in proceedings on administrative offences,  holding a brief for clients
  • Searching and evaluation of administrative risks; appeal of actions and decisions of administrative authorities
  • Preliminary evaluation of administrative consequences of proposed transactions and investment projects
  • Representation of clients within the frameworks of administrative procedures specified by administrative regulations
  • Representation of interests of a self-employed entrepreneur in Kuibishevskiy District Court of Saint-Petersburg in the case on administrative offence, provided by part 2 of the article 18.15 of the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation (employment of a foreign national without due permission for such employment). Proper legal stance allowed to reach a termination of the administrative proceeding).

  • Representation of interests of OOO “Alta” in arbitrage courts of the first and the second instances. The plaintiff was brought to administrative responsibility according to part 3 of article 16.2 of the Russian Administrative Offences Code (case № А56-5776/2011). We filed a petition for adjudication of act of the Pulkovo Customs illegal. The Thirteen Arbitrage court of appeal annulled the decision of the Arbitrage Court of Saint-Petersburg and Leningrad region and declared illegal the ruling of the Pulkovo Customs.

  • Representation of ZAO “Hoffman Professional Tools” in arbitrage courts of the first and the second instances. The plaintiff was brought to administrative responsibility according to part 2 of article 16.2 of the Russian Administrative Offences Code (case № А56-8591/2009). We filed a petition for adjudication of act of Pulkovo Customs illegal. The Arbitrage court of Saint-Petersburg and Leningrad region annulled the ruling of the customs. The Thirteen Arbitrage court of appeal upheld this decision.

  • Termination of administrative proceedings in the judicial district № 132 on the case on commission of administrative offence provided by p.4 art. 12.15 of the Russian Administrative Offences Code for wrong-side driving.

  • Representation of interests of individuals on annulment of rulings of Federal Migration Service in Saint-Petersburg about bringing to administrative responsibility for violation of migration legislation according to an article 18.9 of the Russian Administrative Offences Code. More than 100 ruling were annulled.

  • Termination of administrative proceedings by appeal in Smolninskiy District Court against ruling of justice of peace on case № 5-179/04. The defendant was faced to charges in commission of administrative offence in connection with refusal to pass medical examination for alcohol intoxication.

  • Termination of administrative proceedings in the judicial district № 210 on the case № 5-1031-211/06 about commission of administrative offence in connection with alcohol-impaired driving.

  • Successful protection of interests of an individual in Sebezh district court in case on invalidation of a customs authority’s ruling on bringing to administrative responsibility according to article 16.3 of the Russian Administrative Offences Code.

© Arkona Сo., Ltd.,

112 lit. B, Fontanka Embankment,
St. Petersburg, Russia, 190005
+7 (812) 602-08-16

Contacts Sitemap


Designed by Life-work Studio