Arkona
РусEng
Arkona / Services / Resolution of Disputes

Resolution of Disputes

Pugin Andrey
Pugin Andrey
Chief Executive Officer
Dmitriyev Vladimir
Dmitriyev Vladimir
Partner, Head of Intellectual Property Practice, Attorney at law


Timokhin Mark
Timokhin Mark
Partner, Head of Private Clients Practice, Attorney at law
Efimova Victoria
Efimova Victoria
Partner, Head of Business Support Practice

Representation of client's interests in court is the main direction of activity of Arkona. Our success is based on rich experience in litigation.

Our key activities are:

 

  • disputes on intellectual property rights protection

  • disputes on anti-monopoly regulation, licensing, regulation of advertising, technical and branch law.

  • Commercial disputes

  • corporate disputes

  • disputes on discrediting business reputation

  • disputes in the sphere of real estate, construction and insurance

  • disputes in the sphere of retail, consumer right protection and protection of business against unfounded claims of consumers

  • defense in administrative proceedings

  • other kinds of disputes

 

We tend not only win the case in court but also to enforce implementation of the court's decision. Our lawyers provide information both on legal prospectives of the case and on probability of real obtaining of awarded money or property.

 

OUR SERVICES:

 

  • preliminary legal analysis of litigation prospectives

  • pre-trial dispute resolution procedure, representing the client during negotiation process and working out settlement conditions

  • representing clients in trials wherever it takes place

  • developing a litigation strategy

  • developing a legal stance in legal action, preparing legal opinions

  • interim measures

  • collection of evidences, preparing statements of claim, complaints, motions and other service documents

  • drafting and execution of settlement agreements

  • coordination of client's activity in collateral proceedings with due attention to prospectives of hearing of the case by superior courts, representing clients in hearings at all instances

  • representing clients at the stage of enforcement proceedings

  • levying of execution of judgements in the frameworks of enforcement proceedings

  • enforcement of judgements of foreign state courts and international commercial arbitrages

  • assistance and support in administrative investigations and procedures.

 

  • Reclamation of the real estate complex consisting of two land plots and two buildings worth 210 million rubles from unconscientious buyer (case № А56-57783/2015)

    The buyer made an advance payment in the amount of 16 million rubles, but later refused to pay in accordance with the payment schedule. The seller demanded to return real estate, but was refused. In court, we insisted on the return of the property sold and, after having received a positive decision, re-registered ownership of the seller. A separate claim from the buyer were delinquency charge in the amount of 44 million rubles (Дело № А56-72992/2015).


  • Representing of a Client’s interests in a claim to a contractor for the debt enforcement of the 88 million rubles

    Having signed contractor’s agreement and primary accounting documents, the obviously parties of the agreement had no intention to the actual performance of work. Because of the change of ownership, the client did not make full payment under the agreement. The beneficiary of the contractor, having a complete set of documents confirming the execution of the work, filed a claim for debt enforcement. In preparation for the judicial process, we ordered an expert review, which confirmed that the work was not carried out. This expert review was useful when contacting the police. Forensic examination also confirmed the fact of non-performance of work. These circumstances, in conjunction with the criminal case, prompted the plaintiff to abandon the claim.
     


  • Revindication in favor of the investor a warehouse complex worth more than 200 million rubles from the developer (case № А56-62962/2015)


    The developer has not fulfilled the obligation to transfer the warehouse complex to the investor after commissioning, illegally keeping it in his ownership. In parallel with the conduct of the proceedings, we instituted criminal case on the fact of fraud and the arrest all property objects.
    During the litigation we came to a settlement on our client’s terms then we re-registered the ownership of all real estate properties, carried out measures for the actual transfer of the complex to employees of the company-investor.
     

  • Representing interests of a plaintiff OOO “Stroikomplekt” in the Arbitrage court of Saint-Petersburg. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against OOO “Karyer Petrovskiy” which contained claim to recovery a debt for supplied goods and penalties. Plaintiff fulfilled his obligation to supply replacement parts, but the defendant didn't fulfill his one to pay for them. Lawyers of our company achieved of satisfying of claims. 

  • Representing interest of forwarding agent OOO “Translink” in Arbitrage court of cassation. Our lawyers successfully defended interests of the defendant in the litigation on restitution for unjust enrichment and compensatory interest for the detention of money sounding in forwarding contract.

  • Representing interest of tourist companies in the Arbitrage court of Saint-Petersburg versus ZAO “Senat-kapital”. The lessor refused to transfer the ownership of buses after full payment of lease payments. Lawyers of Arkona filed a lawsuit in court seeking a declaration of title to the buses and achieved success.

  • Representing interests of individual entrepreneur, carried out construction of a foundation of a house in the court of general jurisdiction. A plaintiff filed for substantial defects and demanded to  refund damage and losses in the amount of 1,4 million rubles. At the hearing amicable agreement was signed. According to the agreement the defendant was obliged to pay only 100 000 rubles.

  • Representing interests of individual entrepreneur in tax litigation. In the Arbitrage court of Saint-Petersburg our lawyers achieved reversal of tax authority's ruling on bringing to administrative responsibility for commitment of administrative offence under the paragraph 1 of article 119, paragraph 1 of article 122 of part 1 of the Russian Tax Code.

  • Representing interests of OOO “Mezhdunarodniy Investitsionniy Dom” in Arbirtage courts of 3 instances. Our lawyers helped to the client to recovery costs and unreceived income emerged as a result of non-fulfillment by the defendant of his obligations to transfer functions of construction manager in the building of a house.

  • Representing interests of a plaintiff OOO “Stroikomplekt” in the Arbitrage court of Saint-Petersburg. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against OOO “Karyer Petrovskiy” which contained claim to recovery a debt for supplied goods and penalties. Plaintiff fulfilled his obligation to supply replacement parts, but the defendant didn't fulfill his one to pay for them. Lawyers of our company achieved of satisfying of claims.

© Arkona Сo., Ltd.,

112 lit. B, Fontanka Embankment,
St. Petersburg, Russia, 190005
+7 (812) 602-08-16

Contacts Sitemap


Designed by Life-work Studio